Re: Role of SIG's

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/20/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi

I had previously left the SIG pages during the move to
/PackageMaintainers in the wiki since I wasn't sure the SIG's were
limited to coordination of packaging anymore. What would be a
appropriate place?

Do folks prefer the /PackageMaintainers/SIGs or just /SIG/?

You should not have to be a packager to join a special interest group.
The path of least resistance is that people first join a SIG and then
become a packager, not the other way around.

Getting people to sign up for special interest groups is a good way to
recruit new packagers.

I would actually consider PackageMaintainers as a SIG in itself.  It
makes more sense to me to have /SIG/PackageMaintainers rather than
/PackageMaintainers/SIGs

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux