On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 13:05 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > I would actually consider PackageMaintainers as a SIG in itself. It > makes more sense to me to have /SIG/PackageMaintainers rather than > /PackageMaintainers/SIGs +1 from me. This makes more sense to me and continues along the already in-place lines of having a bug-triaging squad, a documentation group, translation group, etc. -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) / FSF & EFF Member GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/ About: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PeterGordon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
