On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 13:48 -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote: > Okay this whole line of thought is total crackrock. Why do we need to > make value judgements over what packages deserve a fixed ID, and what > doesn't? If we're going to do fixed IDs at all, there's *no* reason we > can't do it for all packages. We run out of space in the 0-499 range > once there's 500 system users either way. Oh, also mixing static and fixed ID only causes problems with dynamic and static IDs colliding. Which only results in *less* efficient use of the number space. Dynamic UIDs only cause us more problems, and solve nothing.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
