Re: Fedora User Management (revisited)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 13:48 -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> Okay this whole line of thought is total crackrock. Why do we need to
> make value judgements over what packages deserve a fixed ID, and what
> doesn't? If we're going to do fixed IDs at all, there's *no* reason we
> can't do it for all packages. We run out of space in the 0-499 range
> once there's 500 system users either way.

Oh, also mixing static and fixed ID only causes problems with dynamic
and static IDs colliding. Which only results in *less* efficient use of
the number space.

Dynamic UIDs only cause us more problems, and solve nothing.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux