John Dennis writes: > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 18:00 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote: > > Jesse Keating writes: > > > On Friday 09 March 2007 12:39:16 Andrew Haley wrote: > > > > Me too. I'd like to continue to use Fedora on headless servers. > > > > > > Specifically with out the few megs that X libs would require? You can still > > > run emacs with the option to not do graphical. > > > > I suppose so, but it would be odd after installing suddenly to > > discover a bunch of X libraries. > > > > -- "What the hell are these libraries for? I didn't ask for them!" > > > > -- "Well, it's all because of the way rpmlint works." > > > > -- "Sorry? Say that again..." > > No, you're missing the point. This is not about rpmlint, the issue is > two packages cannot own the same file. I thought they could, as long as the files were the identical. And, at the present time, the file /usr/bin/emacs does not cause a conflict. As fasr as I've been told, the problem is that rpmlint gets confused, not that there really is a conflict. Andrew. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
