Currently, there are two versions of GNU emacs that can be installed: emacs and emacs-nox. The latter runs in a terminal emulator, the former uses X windows. I'm cleaning up the emacs spec file to meet the Fedora review requirements, and I think the right thing to do would be to have /usr/bin/emacs-22.0.95 /usr/bin/emacs-22.0.95-nox /usr/bin/emacs -> /etc/alternatives/emacs /etc/alternatives/emacs -> /usr/bin/emacs-22.0.95[-nox] In other words, let the /etc/alternatives symlink select which of the two versions runs by default. Is this the right thing to do? If so, should the emacs-nox package have a "Conflicts: emacs" and vice-versa? Your help is appreciated. Chip -- Charles M. "Chip" Coldwell Senior Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc 978-392-2426 -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
