On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:02:52PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:37:15PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > But, not very convincing ones. :) > > If having a fedora box without X installed but still functionnal is not > > convincing I don't know where we are heading. > > As mentioned, you don't need to have an X server installed. The argument for > saving the few megs of disk space used by the X libraries themselves *isn't* > convincing. This is not an issue of space, but of having the choice not to install the X libs. -- Pat -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
