Re: emacs and /etc/alternatives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 08 March 2007 16:31:23 Chip Coldwell wrote:
> I really don't understand the difference between two packages
>
> emacs: with GTK+, etc.
> emacs-nox: without GTK+, etc.
>
> and two packages:
>
> emacs-gnome: with GTK+, etc.
> emacs: without GTK+, etc.
>
> Aside from the renaming, how is this different from the present
> situation?

One would hope that you can do this in such a way that you could 
install 'emacs' and not drag in gnome, and it would do text mode only, and 
then install emacs-gnome which gives emacs the ability to do gui.  Perhaps 
emacs supplies a /usr/bin/emacs script that defaults to /usr/bin/emacs-tui, 
and if you try to pass it -x it will note the lack of /usr/bin/emacs-gnome 
and tell you no, but if you install emacs-gnome subpackage, the libraries and 
deps are then installed and emacs -x would launch the gui emacs.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpd2n6chyxad.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux