On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Jesse Keating wrote: > > Or the even more preferable packaging of emacs that allows the x/gtk > functionality to be split into a subpackage and callable with an option. I really don't understand the difference between two packages emacs: with GTK+, etc. emacs-nox: without GTK+, etc. and two packages: emacs-gnome: with GTK+, etc. emacs: without GTK+, etc. Aside from the renaming, how is this different from the present situation? Chip -- Charles M. "Chip" Coldwell Senior Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc 978-392-2426 -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
