On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 05:51:50PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 09:12:31AM -0500, Chip Coldwell wrote: > > > > Well, then I guess my preference would be to eliminate the -nox subpackage > > from Fedora. We can continue to support it for RHEL, since there will be > > headless servers, etc, that don't need all the GUI infrastructure. > > What! There couldn't be headless servers or X-less workstations running > fedora? This seems to go in the opposite direction of sane objectives > for fedora, and also there has been some very interesting innovations that > should simplify installing fedora in such setups (say the minimal or > server spin). Not to mention blind users for whom emacs without a GUI could *be* their desktop environment. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
