On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 09:12:31AM -0500, Chip Coldwell wrote: > > Well, then I guess my preference would be to eliminate the -nox subpackage > from Fedora. We can continue to support it for RHEL, since there will be > headless servers, etc, that don't need all the GUI infrastructure. What! There couldn't be headless servers or X-less workstations running fedora? This seems to go in the opposite direction of sane objectives for fedora, and also there has been some very interesting innovations that should simplify installing fedora in such setups (say the minimal or server spin). -- Pat -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
