Re: emacs and /etc/alternatives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 01:40:23PM -0500, Chip Coldwell wrote:
Let me clarify this -- /usr/bin/emacs must be either a symlink or a
wrapper script unless the emacs and emacs-nox packages conflict.
Given that, it seems to me like /etc/alternatives is the preferred
solution -- at least it's a standard way to set up a symlink.  It is
definitely the right thing to do on Debian systems.

I don't think it's preferred at all, and particularly not in this case. This
isn't a matter of chosing between two equivalent options -- it's just trying
to address the linked-with-GNOME thing. So it seems like the right thing to
do is use a simple script that runs the big version if it's installed, and
falls back to the svelte one otherwise.

True, that's exactly what alternatives would accomplish too, just in a more complicated way.

-- Rex

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux