Re: emacs and /etc/alternatives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 08 March 2007 12:35:44 Matthias Clasen wrote:
> If the two packages conflict, they cannot be installed in parallel, and
> thus you don't need the alternatives mechanism to pick one...

Or simply name the binary of one emacs-nox and the other emacs.  If nothing 
else conflicts that is.

> But thats probably the best solution: just let the two packages
> conflict.

Sorry no, we don't want any conflicts if at all possible in the package 
collection.  They are ugly and present the user with very confusing and hard 
to deal with error screens.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpEv3c22yB1p.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux