On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 01:43:26PM -0500, Chip Coldwell wrote: > > I thought alternatives had a priority mechanism where the highest > > priority link is used. emacs-x could be made higher priority than > > emacs-nox and would be used if it is installed. > You're right. So that's an argument in favor of using the > /etc/alternatives stuff. What's the advantage, though? Increased complexity in and of itself is not a goal now, is it? :) -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
