Re: RFC: Review with Flags (Version 5)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Dienstag 20 Februar 2007, Warren Togami wrote:

> Remove the use of FE-NEW, FE-REVIEW, and FE-ACCEPT.

For this fedora-review{BLANK,?,+} would be enough and when it is not needed to 
change the blocking bugs anymore, it does not make it more complicated, than 
it is now. Is there als an advantage of using "fedora-review-" instead of 
only using "NEEDINFO" when someone has to do something? And does assigning 
to "nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" or the reviewer instead of 
using "fedora-review{BLANK,?}" and changing to "CLOSED RAWHIDE" instead of 
fedora-review+ not scale, too? I think it is odd to mark the state of a 
ticket with two ways which both need to be done manually, when only one may 
be sufficient.

Regards,
Till

Attachment: pgpWPhJZQTRxx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux