Till Maas wrote:
On Dienstag 20 Februar 2007, Warren Togami wrote:
Remove the use of FE-NEW, FE-REVIEW, and FE-ACCEPT.
For this fedora-review{BLANK,?,+} would be enough and when it is not needed to
change the blocking bugs anymore, it does not make it more complicated, than
it is now. Is there als an advantage of using "fedora-review-" instead of
only using "NEEDINFO" when someone has to do something? And does assigning
to "nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" or the reviewer instead of
using "fedora-review{BLANK,?}" and changing to "CLOSED RAWHIDE" instead of
Eh?
fedora-review+ not scale, too? I think it is odd to mark the state of a
ticket with two ways which both need to be done manually, when only one may
be sufficient.
fedora-review state indicates the state of the review.
BLANK (not yet reviewed)
? (currently under review)
- (needs work!)
+ (approved)
Package Review APPROVED does not mean the package is done.
Bugzilla CLOSED should be clear. CLOSED means the package itself is
done, imported, build and tested.
Yes, this still is confusing and not streamlined, but it is better than
the earlier process. We are limited by the tools, and we need something
NOW.
*PLEASE* help us in the design and implementation of the Package
Database so that we may make this even simpler in the future.
Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
