Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
And... it is obvious that the person who _mainly_ has to take action after the review passed is the submitter, isn't it? Moreover I think that setting assingee as reviewer, which explicitly shows the person who reviewed the bug, makes it easier to trace the reviewes _afterwards_ by bugzilla query or some other methods.
I see. You see the role of the reviewer as an "enforcer", who is responsible to being sure that a review goes through to the end. Even after fedora-review+, the reviewer remains ASSIGNED and accountable, able to follow-up if necessary. OK, I am convinced. ASSIGNED to reviewer (and stays that way) is the best we can do within limitations of our current tools. I guess another draft ensues... Warren -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
