New thought.
Possibly this compromise process satisfies both camps, by eliminating
"bouncing" back and forth, while being assigned to the next actor, and
making logical use of NEEDINFO.
1) State 1: Not Yet Reviewed
ASSIGNED pointer to nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2) State 2: Under Review
ASSIGNED pointer to Reviewer
When fedora-review? or fedora-review-
Use NEEDINFO to request owner to fix something.
3) State 3: Approved
ASSIGNED pointer to Owner
ONLY when fedora-review+
Benefits
========
- No bouncing back and forth between reviewer and owner.
- http://rubenkerkhof.com/review
This page continues to show under "Assigned" who is acting.
- frontpage.cgi shows both ASSIGNED and NEEDINFO for appropriate actors
both during and after the review.
Drawbacks
=========
- You still have to set ASSIGNED to manually, but only twice. (Self,
then to Owner). This is a slight annoyance that I believe we can
optimize away with automation later.
I suspect this logically works. I will update the full review proposal
next.
Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
