On Thursday, 08 February 2007 at 05:20, Warren Togami wrote: > New thought. > > Possibly this compromise process satisfies both camps, by eliminating > "bouncing" back and forth, while being assigned to the next actor, and > making logical use of NEEDINFO. > > 1) State 1: Not Yet Reviewed > ASSIGNED pointer to nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > 2) State 2: Under Review > ASSIGNED pointer to Reviewer > When fedora-review? or fedora-review- > Use NEEDINFO to request owner to fix something. Again: shouldn't fedora-review- be a rather permanent state? I admit that I don't entirely understand the purpose of those flags, whatever they are. > 3) State 3: Approved > ASSIGNED pointer to Owner > ONLY when fedora-review+ Leave assigned to reviewer, please. It's illogical to change it. > Benefits > ======== > - No bouncing back and forth between reviewer and owner. > - http://rubenkerkhof.com/review > This page continues to show under "Assigned" who is acting. > - frontpage.cgi shows both ASSIGNED and NEEDINFO for appropriate actors > both during and after the review. Good! Regards, R. -- Fedora Extras contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski Livna contributor http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
