Re: Eliminate "Bouncing" in Reviews

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 23:20:16 -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
> 1) State 1: Not Yet Reviewed
> ASSIGNED pointer to nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Fine

> 2) State 2: Under Review
> ASSIGNED pointer to Reviewer
> 	When fedora-review? or fedora-review-
> 	Use NEEDINFO to request owner to fix something.

Fine

> 3) State 3: Approved
> ASSIGNED pointer to Owner
> 	ONLY when fedora-review+

I don't understand what is gained here.  Why not leave the ASSIGNED to
reviewer ?

					C

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux