On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 13:32 -0500, Warren Togami wrote: > 1) For all existing packages, pkg.acl file does not exist. So the > openness that existed previously DID NOT CHANGE. > > 2) For newly added packages, pkg.acl exists by default. If you as an > owner don't want such protectionism, just cvs remove it. > > 3) Owners have the *OPTION* to use a pkg.acl file to grant specific > other users access to a locked down package. Whats the big deal? Its the camel's nose in the tent, enabling selfish territorialism.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
