On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 02:43:50PM -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote: > adaptx license.txt > [2] > http://svn.codehaus.org/castor/adaptx/trunk/src/doc/license.txt This seems to be BSD-like to me. There is condition that I dislike, because it doesn't have an obvious meaning (a clause similar is often seen on scientific packages): 5. Due credit should be given to the ExoLab Group (http://www.exolab.org). It doesn't explain when credit is "due", how credit should be given. Is it for the use, the redistribution, both? I don't think this is a blocker, though. My interpretation is that having this license in the package is enough. -- Pat -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
