Hi, I'm currently trying to do to the merge review for adaptx [1] but the license field is troubling: Exolab Software License A google query gives this page (in the cache): http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:kh3l7BHsrJsJ:freshmeat.net/releases/3417/+exolab+osi&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=7&gl=us&lr=lang_en|lang_fr&client=firefox-a Which seems to imply that the license [2] is BSD. It does indeed look quite BSD-ish to me but what should the license field have? Is this okay from a legal standpoint? Spot? Thanks, Andrew
Attachment:
pgpzbeeUDZds5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
