* Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> [2007-02-09 14:51]: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 02:43:50PM -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > adaptx license.txt > > [2] > > http://svn.codehaus.org/castor/adaptx/trunk/src/doc/license.txt > > This seems to be BSD-like to me. There is condition that I dislike, > because it doesn't have an obvious meaning (a clause similar is often > seen on scientific packages): > > 5. Due credit should be given to the ExoLab Group (http://www.exolab.org). > > It doesn't explain when credit is "due", how credit should be given. > Is it for the use, the redistribution, both? I don't think this is a > blocker, though. My interpretation is that having this license in the > package is enough. Okay, so what should License: be? Thanks, Andrew
Attachment:
pgpq1pseHoHOC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
