On Friday 09 February 2007 13:43, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > > > Which seems to imply that the license [2] is BSD. It does indeed look > > quite BSD-ish to me but what should the license field have? Is this > > okay from a legal standpoint? Spot? Best bet is to ask the FSF for clarification. -- Dennis Gilmore, RHCE -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
