Re: Pros & Cons of ASSIGNED pointer and NEEDINFO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, 08 February 2007 at 22:08, Warren Togami wrote:
> Patrice Dumas wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:48:48PM +0100, Ruben Kerkhof wrote:
> >>I would be glad if they spend their time helping us review those  
> >>package, instead of wasting time with this discussion.
> >
> >If it is going to be the process for every new package entering Fedora,
> >it is worth arguing. It is very different from what the fedora extras
> >community is used to and it needs polishing and discussions.
> 
> Meanwhile could we please follow that proposed process for at least the 
> merge reviews, so we make a dent in the giant pile of reviews?

And after we do, are you going to argue that our objections have no merit
because the new process is already used and "works"? I don't like being
bullied into accepting unjustified changes.

Regards,
R.

-- 
Fedora Extras contributor  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski
Livna contributor http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux