On Thursday, 08 February 2007 at 05:01, Warren Togami wrote: > Jens Petersen wrote: > >Warren Togami wrote: > >>It seems that bouncing of the ASSIGNED pointer is a polarizing issue. > >>Some people like it, some people hate it. NEEDINFO is a little less > >>polarizing, although some people hate to bounce too. > > > >I haven't followed all the discussion but it seems to me that > > > >>"ASSIGNED to reviewer, use NEEDINFO as necessary" > > > >looks more consistent with common bugzilla process and usage. > > This is an uncertain point. Is it? > >Furthermore for "ASSIGNED to next actor" one has to keep > >copying'n'pasting the other person's address to reassign to them which > >can get pretty tedious for quick interchanges IMHO. With NEEDINFO it is > >easy just to set "from Reporter" or "from Assignee" etc. > > > > I have not heard any valid argument against "ASSIGNED to next actor" > beyond this user interface problem. With the current user interface, it > can be error prone if reviewers don't read and understand the written > documentation. I have not heard any valid argument in favour of "ASSIGNED to next actor". Regards, R. -- Fedora Extras contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski Livna contributor http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
