On Wednesday, 07 February 2007 at 17:04, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Wednesday, 07 February 2007 at 15:47, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wednesday 07 February 2007 03:42, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > I really dislike needing to ask a CVS admin in for anything, IMHO this > > > needing a CVS-admin for initial import is a serious regression, can't we > > > think of some other way to get this fixed? I never liked the manual > > > requesting of CVS-branches and now things have been made worse. > > > > You're going to need _some_ sort of admin interaction before you can build > > your package for any collection. > > You didn't before. Granted, it was only for devel, but still, it was easy and > convenient. > > > The package has to be added to the build database, and that requires some > > level of admin task. If that task is rolled into preparing the CVS tree > > for the import of your package, then all the better. > > Can we please keep things no more complicated than they were? Initial import > into devel should not require any admin interaction. If it does, why do we > need sponsorship? And review process. > Getting a contributor account was difficult enough, I don't > want to jump through hoops with every new package! After it's already approved, I should've added. Regards, R. -- Fedora Extras contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski Livna contributor http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
