On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:55:25 -0500, Warren Togami wrote: > 2) ASSIGNED begins to nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ASSIGNED to reviewer > during the review, ASSIGNED to package owner after review. ASSIGNED is > to whoever needs to be doing work in the next step of getting the > package out. Makes some amount of sense, thinking about it... > Perhaps #2 makes more sense, but is it too confusing? Well, I got used to the current schema, so this new schema is confusing me a bit anyway... > Either way, Flags track *who* did the review and *who* approved it, and > flags are independently query-able. Yes. But they won't show who the package owner is AFAICT... So I think the owner should be the assignee at least when the package is approved. Dunno how we will know who the package owner is during review with option 2. I think you should name the owner in the initial comment in this case. Did you intend to still have all accepted packages block FE-ACCEPT ? C -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
