On 01/05/2007 08:14 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 12:56 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> - of having to examine specs dist-tags
They shouldn't have passed review if they are hard coded. If they did, a bug needs to be opened to fix it anyway.
You're thinking of only extras here. Many core packages used hardcoded dist tags long before we had the ability to do them. Additionally, specs in extras could get approved without dist tags and then have them hard coded in by someone who mightn't know better.
- of a mass rebuildWhich is likely to get done anyway around Test2. It's been done for the past 2 releases.
...because of significant changes to the toolchain, not because we like to do them. There's no guarantee we'll need one in any given release cycle.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
