On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 12:17 -0500, Christopher Aillon wrote: > On 01/05/2007 08:14 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 12:56 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> - of having to examine specs dist-tags > > > > They shouldn't have passed review if they are hard coded. If they did, > > a bug needs to be opened to fix it anyway. > > You're thinking of only extras here. Many core packages used hardcoded > dist tags long before we had the ability to do them. Additionally, > specs in extras could get approved without dist tags and then have them > hard coded in by someone who mightn't know better. The core packages need to go through a review for the merge anyway. And the latter case is a bug :) > >> - of a mass rebuild > > > > Which is likely to get done anyway around Test2. It's been done for the > > past 2 releases. > > ...because of significant changes to the toolchain, not because we like > to do them. There's no guarantee we'll need one in any given release cycle. Ok true. josh -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
