On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 05:52 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 11:45 +0000, Tim Jackson wrote: > > Christian Iseli wrote: > > > On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 08:59:28 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > >> Me currently votes for fp for "Fedora Packages" (and matches Fedora > > >> Project at the same time, too), because that's what it is afaics. > > > > > > How about we just stay with fc7, and think of it as > > > Fedora, collection 7 ? > > > > Definitely the simplest solution so far :) > > This would save a lot of hassle. > > Why? Unless you've hard coded the dist tag in the spec file (which you > shouldn't be doing), if the dist tag changes on the buildsys you don't > even have to make any changes. A rebuild will just add the new dist > tag. > > What hassle am I missing? The hassle, - this discussion is causing ;) - of having to examine specs dist-tags - of having to adapt other SW (e.g. scripts in buildsystems, build scripts, html scripts on web sites etc.) - of a mass rebuild - of badly chosen dist-tags, such as .f7 Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
