On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 12:20 +0100, Miloslav Trmac wrote: > I don't have that much personal experience with git, but all the emails > in this thread about trying different versions of utilities and so on > seem to support the view that some problems still exist. Not really. Jesse claimed that it didn't pack repositories and we wondered what version he was running since the version packaged for Fedora _definitely_ does. The current version has been shipping in Extras since October, but I'm sure it's been packing repositories for longer than that. I think that discussion probably accounts for most of the questions about 'different versions' except for the ancient historical anecdotes -- it was more of a 'wtf _are_ you running, if you claim that it doesn't pack automatically'? > It's nice when the upstream is responsive, has lots of developers and > usability patches are accepted quickly - but its even better when the > system Just Works, doesn't require the user to care about "packing" and > doesn't _need_ the usability patches in the first place. That's my > experience with mercurial - a system that requires no maintenance. Git also 'just works' and doesn't require the user to care about packing. Any suggestion to the contrary was either out of date, user error or or misinformation. -- dwmw2 -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
