On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 17:39 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 17:05 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> For Fedora Base (aka Core + Extras) I 100% agree but whats wrong with an > >> additional repo which isn't enabled by default which lies the boundary > >> at "no use restrictions accept for non commercial use only"? > >> > >> Again let me reverse the question from why a non commercial repo, to why > >> not? > > > > You are assuming (incorrectly) that Fedora Base is Core + Extras. > > That's not the case. Fedora is anything that is under the Fedora > > Project umbrella. Period. That's why it's not a trivial task to > > announce an official Fedora project. > > > > This need not be an official Fedora project, all we are asking is to be > able to use Fedora Extra's infrastructure, also this need not use Fedora > in the name of the repo. So you're asking for free CVS storage, free build systems, and free bugzilla support from the Fedora Project for something that is not official and goes against one of the goals of Fedora? Forgive me if I ignore this thread from now on... josh -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
