On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 10:18 -0500, bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 > > > tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED > Resolution| |NOTABUG > OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 > nThis| | > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-30 10:18 EST ------- > There are already Fedora repositories that would permit such software. Of > course, nothing in Extras can depend on them. > > It is indeed unfortunate, but it is not the fault of Fedora that the upstream > data is not licensed in a sufficiently free manner. Of cause Fedora also takes it share about this: It's the politics behind Fedora which prevent "legal and free for non-commercial use" packages to be adopted by Fedora and which forces packagers to resort to 3rd parties. May-be it would be more helpful for FE (FESCO) to re-consider their attitude on "non-free repos" in FE. Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
