Adam Jackson wrote: > Right now we have a very strong criteria for freedom. Weakening that > criteria it's a very slippery slope. Why is non-commercial okay? Why > not add non-modifiable? Why not add djb code? _That_ is why people are > objecting so loudly. > I don't want to weaken those criteria I fully support them I even applauded the openmotif kicking and spend a considerable amount of testing and fixing build problems against lesstif. All I'm arguing for is an additional repo for goverment / educational / home users for which the non commercial use clause has 0 effect, thus for this large group of users the software is as free as DFSG free software (unless they want to sell it). There is a demand for such a repo and there are multiple FE contributers who would like to see such a repo, so why not. What harm can it do? Regards, Hans -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
