Adam Jackson wrote: > Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Again let me reverse the question from why a non commercial repo, to why >> not? > > DFSG, clause 6. > I find it amusing that you point at Debian, while they do have an official non free add on repo. I'm not pleading to make Fedora Base (Core + Extras) non free, thats the last thing I would want. I'm pleading for a non commercial addon repo, which is disabled by default! Regards, Hans -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
