Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 14:58 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:21:37AM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> Well, to paraphrase a conversation I had with a few people yesterday, >>> you have to draw the line somewhere. The "no use restrictions" is a >>> reasonable one. >> Not necessarily. it rules out openmotif, although it seems to me that >> it would fit perfectly in this repo. > > > I think before making rules like this, there is a more fundamental > discussion needed: Right now Fedora has a very explicit goal that it > should be ok for 3rd parties to create physical media and sell that for > profit. > > This rule originates I suspect in part from the entire "Oh my god Red > Hat no longer makes media" slashdot crowd effect, but as a whole I think > it does make sense. > > As long as that goal is there, trying to make a decision tree that > undermines the goal is more or less pointless imo; it's a lot better to > first agree/disagree about this goal and THEN look deeper. > Patrice's way of looking at this is unfortunate (atleast for me and Ralf) what I want is not to make Fedora Base (Core + Extras) non free, thats the last thing I would want. I'm pleading for a non commercial addon repo, which is disabled by default! Regards, Hans -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
