On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:51:40 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Denis Leroy wrote: > > > > hmm, I'm not sure i fully understand. Are you requesting anything from > > the packagers ? k3d simply has a BR: python-devel in its main package. > > Does it need a specific R: python then ? > > I think the question is, "Why isn't i386 libpython2.4.so.1.0 in the > x86_64 repo?" The issue has come up before with OpenOffice > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=151539> > > Alternatively, the question is "Why do these packages need > libpython24.so.1.0 and is that proper?" With BR python-devel and a file /usr/lib/k3d/libk3dpython.so.* that looks very much like it's a k3d plugin for Python scripting support. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
