Re: Multilib extras packages need i386 libpython2.4.so on x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Denis Leroy wrote:

hmm, I'm not sure i fully understand. Are you requesting anything from the packagers ? k3d simply has a BR: python-devel in its main package. Does it need a specific R: python then ?

I think the question is, "Why isn't i386 libpython2.4.so.1.0 in the x86_64 repo?" The issue has come up before with OpenOffice <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=151539>

Alternatively, the question is "Why do these packages need libpython24.so.1.0 and is that proper?"

--
Orion Poplawski
System Administrator                  303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux