Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:29:29 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Moving discussion to Fedora Maintainers to bring in core development.
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:38:20 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Broken packages in fedora-extras-development-x86_64:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
csound-5.03.0-5.fc7.i386 requires libpython2.4.so.1.0
k3d-0.6.3.1-1.fc6.i386 requires libpython2.4.so.1.0
koffice-core-1.6.0-2.fc7.i386 requires libpython2.4.so.1.0
koffice-kivio-1.6.0-2.fc7.i386 requires libpython2.4.so.1.0
plplot-5.6.1-7.fc6.i386 requires libpython2.4.so.1.0
plplot-gnome-5.6.1-7.fc6.i386 requires libpython2.4.so.1.0
scribus-1.3.3.4-1.fc6.i386 requires libpython2.4.so.1.0
Why is libpython2.4.so.1.0 missing on x86_64 but not i386?
This is multi-lib enabled Fedora Extras Development.
In addition to Wine (and its dependencies), now i386 -devel packages and
their dependencies are available in x86_64 Extras, too.
If libpython2.4.so.1.0 i386 (!) is not in Rawhide x86_64, we need to talk
about it and either start black-listing i386 Extras packages, which we
don't want to have multi-lib enabled (or fix the sub-packages).
Above are dependencies of:
csound-devel
k3d-devel
koffice-devel
plplot-devel
scribus-devel
So, are the above packages in error, or do we need to get i386
libpython2.4.so into the x86_64 tree?
Very doubtful, because:
$ rpm -q --whatprovides libpython2.4.so.1.0
python-2.4.3-18.fc6
hmm, I'm not sure i fully understand. Are you requesting anything from
the packagers ? k3d simply has a BR: python-devel in its main package.
Does it need a specific R: python then ?
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
