On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:29:29 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Moving discussion to Fedora Maintainers to bring in core development. > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:38:20 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > >>> Broken packages in fedora-extras-development-x86_64: > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> csound-5.03.0-5.fc7.i386 requires libpython2.4.so.1.0 > >>> k3d-0.6.3.1-1.fc6.i386 requires libpython2.4.so.1.0 > >>> koffice-core-1.6.0-2.fc7.i386 requires libpython2.4.so.1.0 > >>> koffice-kivio-1.6.0-2.fc7.i386 requires libpython2.4.so.1.0 > >>> plplot-5.6.1-7.fc6.i386 requires libpython2.4.so.1.0 > >>> plplot-gnome-5.6.1-7.fc6.i386 requires libpython2.4.so.1.0 > >>> scribus-1.3.3.4-1.fc6.i386 requires libpython2.4.so.1.0 > >>> > >> Why is libpython2.4.so.1.0 missing on x86_64 but not i386? > > > > This is multi-lib enabled Fedora Extras Development. > > > > In addition to Wine (and its dependencies), now i386 -devel packages and > > their dependencies are available in x86_64 Extras, too. > > > > If libpython2.4.so.1.0 i386 (!) is not in Rawhide x86_64, we need to talk > > about it and either start black-listing i386 Extras packages, which we > > don't want to have multi-lib enabled (or fix the sub-packages). > > > > Above are dependencies of: > > > > csound-devel > > k3d-devel > > koffice-devel > > plplot-devel > > scribus-devel > > > > So, are the above packages in error, or do we need to get i386 > libpython2.4.so into the x86_64 tree? Very doubtful, because: $ rpm -q --whatprovides libpython2.4.so.1.0 python-2.4.3-18.fc6 -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
