On 10/16/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 02:23:58AM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > >Indeed any package at ATrpms has potential breakage. But this is true > >for any piece of software and package out there. Or did you invent the > >bug-free software? > I am very dissappointed that you think I am inventing problems. Is it > really that hard for you to accept the possibility that there may > exist a problem with an ATrpms package? For one I obviously stated the opposite, I never said that ATrpms managed to get all bits bug-free. For second you already showed that your statements are to be taken with a grain (or ton) of salt. From a never-ever ATrpms user you have mutated to an often-used-often-burned, later consultant-in-removing-ATrpms-packages and so on.
And this is constructive how? Let me quote Hans which already got a +1: Can we please either have a constructive discussion or may I request that you fight this out by private mail instead? -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
