On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 10:00:06PM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > As you can clearly see from this thread Axel is completely ignoring > the fact this his packages break Fedora user's systems [...] The > simple fact of the matter is that ATrpms breaks your system and Axel > refuses to acknowledge the fact, [...] I'm sorry if this makes you > upset, but it happens to be the truth. And it only takes a mail from Seth to make you change that *fact* of ATrpms packages breaking your system to a *potential* breakage. Indeed any package at ATrpms has potential breakage. But this is true for any piece of software and package out there. Or did you invent the bug-free software? Does it make sense to ask you on specific examples on how ATrpms break your system as a fact? A non-invented one, you do have "countless" of people running to you with their problems daily, so you do have tons of examples, right? No, don't bother, I don't want to have to technically argue on the next invented issue you throw at me. Your reply above shows that you're on FUD-mode still. And that's what this is about, you dividing the community and mobbing other fedora contributors. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpImh83XKXQE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
