On 10/16/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 05:13:14PM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > Do you think I am spreading lies here? Let me just collate some quotes of you in the last 24h: Your buzilla comment: a) I do not use ATrpms so I have never had any problems myself. A comment in a previous mail b) Actually, I did once use ATrpms a long time ago, A comment in this mail c) Let me describe my latest issue with ATrpms which I had to deal with not more than a few weeks ago A couple more replies and you will be admitting to be a regular ATrpms user? :)
Here are the facts which will hopefully clear this up for you. 1) I *did* infact use ATrpms a long time ago (probably around FC1 timeframe but I can't say exactly when). 2) The comment in the bug report should have said "I dont CURRENTLY use ATrpms so therefore I dont CURRENTLY have any problems" 3) The issue I dealt with a few weeks ago was with UPSTREAM using ATrpms, not me. 4) as stated above, I will contact upstream and see if they can remember more precisely what the issue was with the nx package. I will let you know once I find out more. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
