Re: Agressive FUD by Fedora contributor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 02:55:04PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> >No, I didn't. If you check the mentioned thread it was about whether
> >that makes sense at all. There was a very prominent objection on this
> >where it was clearly stated that no packages will get altered, so why
> >bother creating bugzilla tickets that would be closed as WONTFIX? That
> >would only create unnecessary conflict situations.
> 
> I did check the thread and found about five mails there and none of them 
> seemed to oppose the idea. I have lost the local copies of fedora lists 
> recently so if you can point me more specifically to the opposition, 
> that would be helpful.

OK, I'll do so in PM, and you will understand why.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpb70qQ8oWJb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux