On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 11:46 +1200, Michael J. Knox wrote: > David Woodhouse wrote: > [snip] > > > The default MTA should be included in Core, and the others should be in > > Extras unless they provide functionality which isn't available from the > > default MTA. > > [snip] > > +1 on that reasoning. However, the road to a concluse agreement on which > app to provide the said functionality in core, I doubt, will be easy :) > > But then again... does it really matter? The goal is to have the lines > between FE and FC to be pretty much transparent for the end user, so > when I build a server and install postfix if it comes from FE instead of > FC I couldn't care Until Extras has .isos at release time lots of people will care. Arguably, that would also be part of the FC<->FE merge but I won't dare make a statement about that. Btw, I personally could care less about .isos. But my views probably don't represent the majority of users. josh