Le mardi 27 juin 2006 à 23:47 +0100, David Woodhouse a écrit : > On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 17:48 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Running some dependency analysis on Core yielded a few packages > > in the following groups. This isn't exhaustive, by any means; there > > are still quite a few leaf nodes that are potential Extras candidates. > > There's no excuse for Postfix being in core, is there? It duplicates > basic functionality which is provided by sendmail. I didn't know you were doing bidi in english now. The usual sentence order would read "There's no excuse for Sendmail being in core, is there? It duplicates basic functionality which is provided by Postfix." Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
