Steve Grubb (sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Monday 12 June 2006 17:48, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > This isn't exhaustive, by any means; there are still quite a few leaf nodes > > that are potential Extras candidates. > > I was wondering why we have autoconf213, automake14, and automake15 still in > the repo? I was able to eliminate them from my build tree 2 years ago. Also, > is there any reason to keep byacc? I was able to substitute bison for > everything that wanted byacc and eliminated it from my buildtree too. # repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps autoconf213 automake14 automake15 --archlist i686,i386,noarch,src --repoid development --repoid development-source mozilla-37:1.7.13-1.1.fc5.src gtk+-1:1.2.10-50.src star-0:1.5a74-2.src tetex-0:3.0-24.src pam_smb-0:1.1.7-7.2.src emacs-0:21.4-14.1.src libIDL-0:0.8.6-5.src metacity-0:2.15.5-5.src gnome-mag-0:0.12.5-1.src gtk+-1:1.2.10-50.src gdm-1:2.15.3-7.src gnome-session-0:2.15.1-4.src librsvg2-0:2.15.0-1.src libwmf-0:0.2.8.4-8.src nss_db-0:2.2-35.src Bill
