On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 18:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Library + binary packages required by nothing (could be killed, or moved): > > mysqlclient10 > > mysqlclient14 > > Those are compatibility packages to provide ABI compatibility for > programs built against old versions of libmysqlclient.so. They were > always intended to have a limited lifespan --- I don't see a reason to > carry them forward into FC6, unless we want to offer them in RHEL5. > Do we promise ABI compatibility across RHEL releases? Why do RHEL ABI practices have an impact whether or not a package stays in Fedora Core or gets moved to Fedora Extras? josh
