Bill Nottingham wrote:
Steve Grubb (sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
On Monday 12 June 2006 17:48, Bill Nottingham wrote:
This isn't exhaustive, by any means; there are still quite a few leaf nodes
that are potential Extras candidates.
I was wondering why we have autoconf213, automake14, and automake15 still in
the repo? I was able to eliminate them from my build tree 2 years ago. Also,
is there any reason to keep byacc? I was able to substitute bison for
everything that wanted byacc and eliminated it from my buildtree too.
# repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps autoconf213 automake14 automake15 --archlist i686,i386,noarch,src --repoid development --repoid development-source
mozilla-37:1.7.13-1.1.fc5.src
gtk+-1:1.2.10-50.src
star-0:1.5a74-2.src
tetex-0:3.0-24.src
pam_smb-0:1.1.7-7.2.src
emacs-0:21.4-14.1.src
libIDL-0:0.8.6-5.src
metacity-0:2.15.5-5.src
gnome-mag-0:0.12.5-1.src
gtk+-1:1.2.10-50.src
gdm-1:2.15.3-7.src
gnome-session-0:2.15.1-4.src
librsvg2-0:2.15.0-1.src
libwmf-0:0.2.8.4-8.src
nss_db-0:2.2-35.src
Would it be much work to move these way from those requirements?
Michael
